electronic medical record (emr) platform cerner powerchart Search Results


emr applications  (Cerner Corporation)
86
Cerner Corporation emr applications
Emr Applications, supplied by Cerner Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/electronic+medical+record+%28emr%29+platform+cerner+powerchart/us12488892-429-4-18?v=Cerner+Corporation
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
emr applications - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
electronic medical record emr  (Cerner Corporation)
86
Cerner Corporation electronic medical record emr
Electronic Medical Record Emr, supplied by Cerner Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/electronic+medical+record+%28emr%29+platform+cerner+powerchart/pmc10863332-25-6-10?v=Cerner+Corporation
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
electronic medical record emr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
emr  (Cerner Corporation)
86
Cerner Corporation emr
Emr, supplied by Cerner Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/electronic+medical+record+%28emr%29+platform+cerner+powerchart/pmc13190257-56-12-13?v=Cerner+Corporation
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
emr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
electronic health records  (Cerner Corporation)
86
Cerner Corporation electronic health records
Fig. 1 Self-reported duration of <t>electronic</t> chart review for new medical ICU patients, grouped by team role (n ¼ 153). X-axis repre- sents team role. Box plots represent the 25th, 50th (median), and 75th percentiles, with whiskers extending to 1.5 Interquartile range. Kruskal–Wallis test for pooled analysis of variance showed no sig- nificant difference among ICU team role groupings for “average” patients (p ¼ 0.33) or “complex” patient (p ¼ 0.41). “Complex” patients were defined as those patients in the top 10th percentile for medical complexity or protracted hospital course. APP, advanced practice provider; ICU, intensive care unit.
Electronic Health Records, supplied by Cerner Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/electronic+medical+record+%28emr%29+platform+cerner+powerchart/10__4338_slash_aci___2017___04___ra___0060-17-31-43?v=Cerner+Corporation
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
electronic health records - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
epicare®emr  (EPICARE Inc)
90
EPICARE Inc epicare®emr
Fig. 1 Self-reported duration of <t>electronic</t> chart review for new medical ICU patients, grouped by team role (n ¼ 153). X-axis repre- sents team role. Box plots represent the 25th, 50th (median), and 75th percentiles, with whiskers extending to 1.5 Interquartile range. Kruskal–Wallis test for pooled analysis of variance showed no sig- nificant difference among ICU team role groupings for “average” patients (p ¼ 0.33) or “complex” patient (p ¼ 0.41). “Complex” patients were defined as those patients in the top 10th percentile for medical complexity or protracted hospital course. APP, advanced practice provider; ICU, intensive care unit.
Epicare®Emr, supplied by EPICARE Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/electronic+medical+record+%28emr%29+platform+cerner+powerchart/pmc03795928__gim201372x3-144-8-5?v=EPICARE+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
epicare®emr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cerner powerchart v2018 01  (Cerner Corporation)
86
Cerner Corporation cerner powerchart v2018 01
Fig. 1 Self-reported duration of <t>electronic</t> chart review for new medical ICU patients, grouped by team role (n ¼ 153). X-axis repre- sents team role. Box plots represent the 25th, 50th (median), and 75th percentiles, with whiskers extending to 1.5 Interquartile range. Kruskal–Wallis test for pooled analysis of variance showed no sig- nificant difference among ICU team role groupings for “average” patients (p ¼ 0.33) or “complex” patient (p ¼ 0.41). “Complex” patients were defined as those patients in the top 10th percentile for medical complexity or protracted hospital course. APP, advanced practice provider; ICU, intensive care unit.
Cerner Powerchart V2018 01, supplied by Cerner Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/electronic+medical+record+%28emr%29+platform+cerner+powerchart/10__1200_slash_cci__20__00083-26-20-23?v=Cerner+Corporation
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cerner powerchart v2018 01 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
electronic medical records systems  (Cerner Corporation)
86
Cerner Corporation electronic medical records systems
Fig. 1 Self-reported duration of <t>electronic</t> chart review for new medical ICU patients, grouped by team role (n ¼ 153). X-axis repre- sents team role. Box plots represent the 25th, 50th (median), and 75th percentiles, with whiskers extending to 1.5 Interquartile range. Kruskal–Wallis test for pooled analysis of variance showed no sig- nificant difference among ICU team role groupings for “average” patients (p ¼ 0.33) or “complex” patient (p ¼ 0.41). “Complex” patients were defined as those patients in the top 10th percentile for medical complexity or protracted hospital course. APP, advanced practice provider; ICU, intensive care unit.
Electronic Medical Records Systems, supplied by Cerner Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/electronic+medical+record+%28emr%29+platform+cerner+powerchart/pmc12322462-114-24-19?v=Cerner+Corporation
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
electronic medical records systems - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
medmined surveillance advisor application  (Becton Dickinson)
90
Becton Dickinson medmined surveillance advisor application
Fig. 1 Self-reported duration of <t>electronic</t> chart review for new medical ICU patients, grouped by team role (n ¼ 153). X-axis repre- sents team role. Box plots represent the 25th, 50th (median), and 75th percentiles, with whiskers extending to 1.5 Interquartile range. Kruskal–Wallis test for pooled analysis of variance showed no sig- nificant difference among ICU team role groupings for “average” patients (p ¼ 0.33) or “complex” patient (p ¼ 0.41). “Complex” patients were defined as those patients in the top 10th percentile for medical complexity or protracted hospital course. APP, advanced practice provider; ICU, intensive care unit.
Medmined Surveillance Advisor Application, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/electronic+medical+record+%28emr%29+platform+cerner+powerchart/pmc06736129__ofz352_suppl_supplementary_material-6-12-16?v=Becton+Dickinson
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
medmined surveillance advisor application - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
preoperative software tool cerner powerform  (Cerner Corporation)
86
Cerner Corporation preoperative software tool cerner powerform
Fig. 1 Self-reported duration of <t>electronic</t> chart review for new medical ICU patients, grouped by team role (n ¼ 153). X-axis repre- sents team role. Box plots represent the 25th, 50th (median), and 75th percentiles, with whiskers extending to 1.5 Interquartile range. Kruskal–Wallis test for pooled analysis of variance showed no sig- nificant difference among ICU team role groupings for “average” patients (p ¼ 0.33) or “complex” patient (p ¼ 0.41). “Complex” patients were defined as those patients in the top 10th percentile for medical complexity or protracted hospital course. APP, advanced practice provider; ICU, intensive care unit.
Preoperative Software Tool Cerner Powerform, supplied by Cerner Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/electronic+medical+record+%28emr%29+platform+cerner+powerchart/10__1213_slash_01__ane__0000403380__73932__6a-1749-14-16?v=Cerner+Corporation
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
preoperative software tool cerner powerform - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
medical record emr software  (Cerner Corporation)
86
Cerner Corporation medical record emr software
Fig. 1 Self-reported duration of <t>electronic</t> chart review for new medical ICU patients, grouped by team role (n ¼ 153). X-axis repre- sents team role. Box plots represent the 25th, 50th (median), and 75th percentiles, with whiskers extending to 1.5 Interquartile range. Kruskal–Wallis test for pooled analysis of variance showed no sig- nificant difference among ICU team role groupings for “average” patients (p ¼ 0.33) or “complex” patient (p ¼ 0.41). “Complex” patients were defined as those patients in the top 10th percentile for medical complexity or protracted hospital course. APP, advanced practice provider; ICU, intensive care unit.
Medical Record Emr Software, supplied by Cerner Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/electronic+medical+record+%28emr%29+platform+cerner+powerchart/pm39880778-41-3-7?v=Cerner+Corporation
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
medical record emr software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Fig. 1 Self-reported duration of electronic chart review for new medical ICU patients, grouped by team role (n ¼ 153). X-axis repre- sents team role. Box plots represent the 25th, 50th (median), and 75th percentiles, with whiskers extending to 1.5 Interquartile range. Kruskal–Wallis test for pooled analysis of variance showed no sig- nificant difference among ICU team role groupings for “average” patients (p ¼ 0.33) or “complex” patient (p ¼ 0.41). “Complex” patients were defined as those patients in the top 10th percentile for medical complexity or protracted hospital course. APP, advanced practice provider; ICU, intensive care unit.

Journal: Applied Clinical Informatics

Article Title: A Multisite Survey Study of EMR Review Habits, Information Needs, and Display Preferences among Medical ICU Clinicians Evaluating New Patients

doi: 10.4338/aci-2017-04-ra-0060

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 1 Self-reported duration of electronic chart review for new medical ICU patients, grouped by team role (n ¼ 153). X-axis repre- sents team role. Box plots represent the 25th, 50th (median), and 75th percentiles, with whiskers extending to 1.5 Interquartile range. Kruskal–Wallis test for pooled analysis of variance showed no sig- nificant difference among ICU team role groupings for “average” patients (p ¼ 0.33) or “complex” patient (p ¼ 0.41). “Complex” patients were defined as those patients in the top 10th percentile for medical complexity or protracted hospital course. APP, advanced practice provider; ICU, intensive care unit.

Article Snippet: All the three sites used three core medical record applications that were developed internally for electronic medical record (EMR) viewing (Synthesis, AWARE, QREADS), as well as a combination of two commercial electronic health records (EHRs, customized versions of General Electric Company Centricity and Cerner PowerChart).

Techniques:

Fig. 3 Perceived usefulness and time spent reviewing electronic information for new medical ICU patients (n = 155). “Please rate the following data elements for USEFULNESS in satisfying your chart review information needs” and “Please rate the following data elements for AVERAGE TIME SPENT per element (compared to total time spent in chart review) in satisfying your chart review information needs.” Data elements ordered in descending order by perceived usefulness, with darker heatmap coloring indicating a higher proportion of respondents. Side-by-side mini- histograms correspond to the adjacent percentages within a column and allow visual estimation of concordance/discordance between the “utility” of information and the relative “time spent” in review. ICU; intensive care unit. aDiagnostic studies excluding primary imaging studies. bOther data (e.g., advance directives, upcoming appointments, pending orders, nursing flowsheet data).

Journal: Applied Clinical Informatics

Article Title: A Multisite Survey Study of EMR Review Habits, Information Needs, and Display Preferences among Medical ICU Clinicians Evaluating New Patients

doi: 10.4338/aci-2017-04-ra-0060

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 3 Perceived usefulness and time spent reviewing electronic information for new medical ICU patients (n = 155). “Please rate the following data elements for USEFULNESS in satisfying your chart review information needs” and “Please rate the following data elements for AVERAGE TIME SPENT per element (compared to total time spent in chart review) in satisfying your chart review information needs.” Data elements ordered in descending order by perceived usefulness, with darker heatmap coloring indicating a higher proportion of respondents. Side-by-side mini- histograms correspond to the adjacent percentages within a column and allow visual estimation of concordance/discordance between the “utility” of information and the relative “time spent” in review. ICU; intensive care unit. aDiagnostic studies excluding primary imaging studies. bOther data (e.g., advance directives, upcoming appointments, pending orders, nursing flowsheet data).

Article Snippet: All the three sites used three core medical record applications that were developed internally for electronic medical record (EMR) viewing (Synthesis, AWARE, QREADS), as well as a combination of two commercial electronic health records (EHRs, customized versions of General Electric Company Centricity and Cerner PowerChart).

Techniques: Imaging

Fig. 2 Self-reported historical depth of electronic chart review for new medical ICU patients (n ¼ 155). “On average, how far back into the record do you review during a typical chart review?” (Y-axis). Histogram bars and counts appear on the left side of the figure, with the right stacked column indicating relative percentages. ICU, in- tensive care unit.

Journal: Applied Clinical Informatics

Article Title: A Multisite Survey Study of EMR Review Habits, Information Needs, and Display Preferences among Medical ICU Clinicians Evaluating New Patients

doi: 10.4338/aci-2017-04-ra-0060

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 2 Self-reported historical depth of electronic chart review for new medical ICU patients (n ¼ 155). “On average, how far back into the record do you review during a typical chart review?” (Y-axis). Histogram bars and counts appear on the left side of the figure, with the right stacked column indicating relative percentages. ICU, in- tensive care unit.

Article Snippet: All the three sites used three core medical record applications that were developed internally for electronic medical record (EMR) viewing (Synthesis, AWARE, QREADS), as well as a combination of two commercial electronic health records (EHRs, customized versions of General Electric Company Centricity and Cerner PowerChart).

Techniques: